As some of you may be aware, a few months ago, NorthumberlandView.ca won an entry in this year’s Web Marketing Awards WebAwards. Today I received a report from the WMA with the Judge’s assessment of NorthumberlandView.ca.
Most of the negative comments about the site were related to the design of NorthumberlandView.ca. There were positive comments for the site’s content. It’s constructive criticism and I take it for what it is, and who it comes from. The judges in this international competition are widely considered to be the best of the best in the industry. Three judges were assigned to look at NorthumberlandView.ca and their scores and comments are listed below.
Industry average based on all sites entered within category. WebAwards average based on all sites entered in 2011 WebAwards.
| Criteria | Your Score | Industry Average | WebAward Avg |
| Design | 4 | 6.6 | 7.7 |
| Innovation | 3 | 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Content | 8 | 8.5 | 8 |
| Technology | 5.5 | 7.1 | 7.3 |
| Interactivity | 7 | 7.7 | 7.6 |
| Copywriting | 7 | 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Ease of use | 6 | 7.4 | 7.8 |
| Overall Score | 40.5 | 47 | 53.4 |
Judges Comments
Below are the comments (if any) submitted by the judges reviewing your entry. Please note that these comments are the unedited views of the individual judges and not those of the Web Marketing Association. Also please remember that your final score was determined by the average of the highest two scores provided by the judges and comments received my not be necessarily indicative of the final score you received.
“Although the site has loads of relevant content, is easy to navigate and find loacl news its really ugly and doesn’t have any aesthetic appeal. “
“This site should not have been submitted to an awards competition – it’s professional-looking but looks like hundreds – or thousands – of others just like it”
“Unfortunately this site looks very amateurish. The logo/header on the top is not very professional looking. It looks like the site developers simply made a few modifications to a free content management system template. The design is disjointed, full of ads and the main navigation is small and hard to read. I don’t feel like this site is very cohesive or easy to use. It does give users a lot of content, but the pages are a little overwhelming. Overall this site could be improved by working more on design consistency, a new logo and removing the social media bar at the bottom of the page. Social media links are great, but should be integrated into the site, not just tacked on at the bottom.”
I’m not sure about “amateurish” but I do take their comments as the impartial observations of web professionals. I did chuckle a bit at the comment that said that NorthumberlandView.ca should not have been submitted to an awards competition. The only reason that I had submitted the site was because I had won the entry. I knew that I wouldn’t win, especially when compared to previous winners in the News Category (NBC, Slate, NYTimes.com, BusinessWeek Online, etc) I figured that at the very least, I would get an impartial assessment of my site.
I’m always looking for feedback and ways to improve NorthumberlandView.ca so this is a good start. If you have any comments or suggestions for ways to improve NorthumberlandView.ca please feel free to let me know. You can email me at info@northumberlandview.ca. I’ll take any comments and feedback and use it to improve the site.